A Conversation on Vaccines

Last year we had a great set of conversations on vaccines. Back by popular demand I will have one more vaccine seminar scheduled for Sunday, February 1, 2026, at 4:00 pm. See below for a breakdown of the topics discussed:

1) The institutional Setting:

A) Health care is a STATE function regarding its allocation but its research, recommendations, guidance, partnership, and increasingly finance have become FEDERAL functions (primarily via the large, cabinet level, Health and Human Services Department). The FDA, CDC, and NIH fall under the aegis of the HHS. These organizations often employ scientific methods to determine the efficacy and safety of new vaccines. Unscientific studies employ inference without showing correlation or causation.

B) Faced with decreased vaccine production and monopolistic higher prices due to lawsuits on smaller vaccine manufacturers, the federal government assumed liability for adverse vaccine affects and set up a special court to hear and award compensation. Thus, the 1980s saw a proliferation in vaccine production with technologies that allowed for much LESS immune antigenic exposure then previous. This encouraged the targeting of other deadly infectious diseases. Although the fewer antigenic exposure was more efficient than previous it required more boosters which meant more exposure to other vaccine components like preservatives. Most studies show that these vaccines and their components are safe, TODAY.

2) The Philosophical Setting:

A) The aim of Vaccination is to manipulate Nature (our immune system) on our behalf much like antibiotics for infections or anesthesia with childbirth. Vaccination weaves a web of disease-resistant communities that retard the ability for infection to gain a foot hold causing the human host requiring organisms to become extinct. This web is herd immunity, and it protects those who cannot be vaccinated by requiring 80-95% of the population vaccinated (depending on the infectivity of the organism and the effectiveness of the vaccine to prevent spread).

B) The “Natural Exposure” may import a “stronger” more numerous, but wasteful antigenic exposure that decreases the need for boosters but is uncontrolled and can lead to needless tragedy.

C) The extreme “Survival of the Fittest Immune System” shows a misunderstanding of the immune system’s Innate and Adoptive systems. It deprives medical assistance and allows for significant morbidity and mortality. There is no such thing as “GOOD or BAD” genes but only lucky ones as certain circumstances can determine later.

3) The Ethical Setting:

A) All major religions accept vaccinations despite that some were developed from aborted human fetuses. Because the intent for these abortions was not for vaccine development their use was likened to ethical human transplant donations. The only two, original, 30 year-old cell lines are still in use today.

I hope I have answered your questions with the honest integrity and exactness you deserve, which met your satisfaction. To that end, I hope I have provided you with accurate information that can steer you in the correct direction to help you make the best decision for you and yours because as always…………… Our Children Are Worth It! Thank you again for your cooperation.